Four questions before you spend anything on Claude training.
These are the questions I ask on a first call. Answer them honestly, in a room, with the people who would have to pay for it. If all four are yes, you do not need training and you should keep the budget.
Is more than a third of your team getting useful work out of it every week?
Not signed in, and not curious. Useful work, weekly.
Can the people who are good at it explain what they do differently?
If your best user shrugs and says they have a knack for it, the knack is not going anywhere.
Has anyone written down what you will not use it for?
One page is enough. It does not exist until it is written.
Did the last workflow anyone built survive a month?
Plenty of good ideas die in week three.
You have the habit, and it is spreading on its own. There is nothing I would add. Most teams I speak to manage one, occasionally two.
Both are yours to fix and neither costs anything. Write the one page on what this will not be used for. Then put your two best users in front of everyone else and make them narrate a real task out loud, start to finish, including the bits they would normally skip.
These are the two that do not fix themselves. A knack nobody can describe does not spread, and a workflow that died in week three will die in week three again.
Three situations make training the wrong purchase whatever your score: nobody has agreed what the tool is for, the leadership team does not use it and does not plan to, or nobody has settled what may safely be typed into it. Each is free to fix, and none of them is a training problem.